4049 2006-12-08 20:13:58 +0000 DataTypes tests: QNames and length facets 2008-11-13 12:14:52 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XML Schema Test Suite Microsoft tests 2006-11-06 PC Windows XP RESOLVED FIXED all metadata now correct 2008-11-13 P2 normal --- 1 mike ht public-xml-schema-testsuite oldest_to_newest 13101 0 mike 2006-12-08 20:13:58 +0000 In the (Microsoft) Datatypes tests, certain tests appear to assume that an instance document can be invalid because a QName or NOTATION does not satisfy the length, minLength, or maxLength facet defined in the schema. However, the specification is clear that although these facets are allowed (and deprecated), they have no effect on validity. See Validation Rule: Length Valid clause 1.3 Validation Rule: minLength Valid clause 1.3 Validation Rule: maxLength Valid clause 1.3 Affected tests include: <test group="QName_length001_1357" name="QName_length001_1357.i"/> <test group="QName_length003_1359" name="QName_length003_1359.i"/> <test group="QName_minLength003_1362" name="QName_minLength003_1362.i"/> <test group="QName_maxLength001_1364" name="QName_maxLength001_1364.i"/> <test group="NOTATION_length001_1372" name="NOTATION_length001_1372.i"/> <test group="NOTATION_length003_1374" name="NOTATION_length003_1374.i"/> <test group="NOTATION_minLength003_1377" name="NOTATION_minLength003_1377.i"/> <test group="NOTATION_maxLength001_1379" name="NOTATION_maxLength001_1379.i"/> 13560 1 arthurdm 2007-01-15 21:22:34 +0000 Additional tests that have this bug: msData/additional/test73986_2.xml msData/additional/test73986.xsd 13834 2 zafara 2007-01-29 22:32:07 +0000 Agreed that these tests are not applicable per spec. We are following up with the WG to determine the process of updating the test suite. 20692 3 mike 2008-06-21 15:03:28 +0000 Agreed that these tests do no violate the length/minlength/maxlength facets. In theory before marking them valid we should check that they are not invalid for some other reason, however it appears they pass validation by Xerces and Saxon so they are probably OK. 22426 4 ht 2008-11-13 12:07:25 +0000 *** Bug 4122 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***