4038 2006-12-06 16:03:55 +0000 Nested policy in normal form - Example does not match expectations 2006-12-14 09:12:53 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WS-Policy Framework LC PC Windows XP RESOLVED FIXED http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-ws-policy-20061117/#Policy_Assertion_Nesting P2 normal --- 1 david.illsley fsasaki public-ws-policy-qa oldest_to_newest 13083 0 david.illsley 2006-12-06 16:03:55 +0000 Section 4.3 indicates that nested policy is normalised recursively therefore I'd expect nested policy in normal form to have the same structure as the outer policy e.g wsp:Policy/wsp:ExactlyOne/wsp:All/* The example of normal form of nested policy in section 4.3.2 does not exhibit this - lines 12-14, 23-25, 28-30 i.e. (12) <wsp:Policy> (13) <sp:HttpsToken RequireClientCertificate="false" /> (14) </wsp:Policy> I would expect: (12) <wsp:Policy> (13) <wsp:ExactlyOne> (14) <wsp:All> (15) <sp:HttpsToken RequireClientCertificate="false" /> (16) </wsp:All> (17) </wsp:ExactlyOne> (18) </wsp:Policy> If my expectation is incorrect, can I suggest an explanation of why this is the case in section 4.3.2 Thanks, David 13167 1 pcotton 2006-12-13 17:29:00 +0000 Resolved at Dec 13 meeting with proposal in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0034.html http://www.w3.org/2006/12/13-ws-policy-irc#T17-28-11 Replace - "The normalized form of the example above is equivalent to the following:" With - "The example above is equivalent to the following:". /paulc 13178 2 david.illsley 2006-12-14 09:12:53 +0000 Hi Paul, I agree with this resolution. Thanks, David