<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>3987</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2006-11-18 01:26:43 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>[Guidelines] Section 5.9 - Lifecycle of Assertions?</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2007-03-14 18:07:32 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>WS-Policy</product>
          <component>Guidelines</component>
          <version>FPWD</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Windows XP</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Asir V Selvasingh">asirveda</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Felix Sasaki">fsasaki</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="Web Services Policy WG QA List">public-ws-policy-qa</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>12956</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Asir V Selvasingh">asirveda</who>
    <bug_when>2006-11-18 01:26:43 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Title: Lifecycle of Assertions?

Description: Section 5.9 &apos;Lifecycle of Assertions&apos; [1] in the Guidelines document claims to cover three topics:

a) Assertion extensibility,
b) Policy language extensibility and
c) Subject attachment extensibility.

Topic b) is covered by the Primer in Section 4.4.8 [2] &apos;Versioning Policy Language&apos;. At the Sonic F2F, for issue 3792 [3], the WG decided to retain &apos;Versioning Policy Language&apos; topic in the Primer. So, this is a content overlap between the Primer and the Guidelines document.

It is not clear what &apos;Subject attachment extensibility&apos; (Topic c)) means. There isn&apos;t any text in Section 5.9 on this topic.

At a high level, it appears that Section 5.9 is about versioning policy assertions.

Justification: The title for Section 5.9 is misleading. In Section 5.9, there is some content overlap between the Primer and the Guidelines document.

Proposal: There are two parts:

1. s/Lifecycle of Assertions/Versioning Policy Assertions/g
2. Drop any references to &apos;Policy Language Extensibility&apos; and &apos;Subject attachment Extensibility&apos;.

[1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy-guidelines.html?rev=1.8&amp;content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#lifecycle

[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-ws-policy-primer-20061018/#versioning-policy-language

[3] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3792</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>14414</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Christopher Ferris">chrisfer</who>
    <bug_when>2007-03-13 23:19:30 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Partial resolution for 3987:

Paul: issue 3987, change title, no changes to policy language extensibility, and AI for attachment subject extensibility
... leaving issue open based on AI

&lt;PaulC&gt; We are taking action on the following change:

&lt;PaulC&gt; s/Lifecycle of Assertions/Versioning Policy Assertions/g

&lt;PaulC&gt; Asir withdraws his request to delete bullet two &quot;Policy Language Extensibility&quot;

&lt;PaulC&gt; Asir withdraws his request to delete bullet two &quot;Policy Language Extensibility&quot;

&lt;PaulC&gt; And we have an action to deal with the third item.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>14415</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Christopher Ferris">chrisfer</who>
    <bug_when>2007-03-13 23:20:07 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>forgot link: http://www.w3.org/2007/01/31-ws-policy-minutes.html</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>14429</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Christopher Ferris">chrisfer</who>
    <bug_when>2007-03-14 18:07:32 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>[14:06] cferris: RESOLUTION: issue 3987 resolved with maryann&apos;s proposal in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Mar/0096.html and add the best practice suggest in the email
[14:06] cferris: rrsagent, where am i?
[14:06] RRSAgent: See http://www.w3.org/2007/03/14-ws-policy-irc#T18-07-08</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>