3963 2006-11-08 21:23:25 +0000 Editorial work on "Attribute Locally Valid (Use)" 2009-04-21 19:21:43 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XML Schema Structures: XSD Part 1 1.1 only All All CLOSED FIXED resolved P4 minor --- 1 sandygao cmsmcq cmsmcq www-xml-schema-comments oldest_to_newest 12872 0 sandygao 2006-11-08 21:23:25 +0000 In schema 1.1 structures draft, the constraint "Attribute Locally Valid (Use)" currently reads: "The item's ·actual value· matches the {value} of the {value constraint}, if it is present and its {variety} is fixed. For an attribute information item to be·valid· with respect to an attribute use its ·actual value· must be identical to the {value} of the attribute use's {value constraint}, if it is present and has {variety} fixed." where the first paragraph looks very suspecious. And obviously a space is needed between "be" and "·valid·". 18143 1 cmsmcq 2007-12-20 21:37:04 +0000 Cf. bug 4470 18574 2 cmsmcq 2008-01-25 21:20:27 +0000 *** Bug 5258 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** 18576 3 cmsmcq 2008-01-25 21:21:43 +0000 *** Bug 4470 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** 18718 4 cmsmcq 2008-02-04 16:17:24 +0000 In an effort to make better use of Bugzilla, we are going to use the 'severity' field to classify issues by perceived difficulty. This bug is getting severity=minor to reflect the existing whiteboard note 'easy'. 18858 5 cmsmcq 2008-02-08 02:19:41 +0000 A wording proposal including changes for this issue went to the WG on 7 February 2008: http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.consent.200801.html#composition (member-only link). 18901 6 cmsmcq 2008-02-08 19:56:01 +0000 The 'Structures Omnibus 1' proposal mentioned in an earlier comment was adopted by the XML Schema Working Group today. http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.consent.200801.html (member-only link) The XML Schema WG believes that the changes adopted today resolve this issue fully. I'm changing its status accordingly. The change in status should cause email to be sent to the originator of this issue, to whom the following request is addressed. Please review the changes adopted and let us know if you agree with this resolution of your issue, by adding a comment to the issue record and changing the Status of the issue to Closed. Or, if you do not agree with this resolution, please add a comment explaining why. If you wish to appeal the WG's decision to the Director, then also change the Status of the record to Reopened. If you wish to record your dissent, but do not wish to appeal the decision to the Director, then change the Status of the record to Closed. If we do not hear from you in the next two weeks, we will assume you agree with the WG decision.