<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>3955</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2006-11-06 20:59:44 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Superfluous block/final values</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2009-04-21 19:21:43 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>XML Schema</product>
          <component>Structures: XSD Part 1</component>
          <version>1.1 only</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords>resolved</keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Sandy Gao">sandygao</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="C. M. Sperberg-McQueen">cmsmcq</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="XML Schema comments list">www-xml-schema-comments</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>12844</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Sandy Gao">sandygao</who>
    <bug_when>2006-11-06 20:59:44 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>In 1.0, {disallowed substitution} on element declaration (from &quot;block&quot;) didn&apos;t allow &quot;list&quot; or &quot;union&quot; (section 3.3.1). They are now allowed in 1.0, but they shouldn&apos;t be.

Similarly, 1.0 didn&apos;t allow &quot;substitution&quot; in simple types&apos; {final}, but 1.1 now allows it (section 3.15.1).

Both changes should be reverted to match what 1.0 had.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>12845</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Sandy Gao">sandygao</who>
    <bug_when>2006-11-06 21:12:12 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The same applies to {final} on complex types. It should only allow {extension, restriction}.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>13003</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Sandy Gao">sandygao</who>
    <bug_when>2006-11-22 05:30:11 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Proposal: to change the component description as suggested.

Resolution: adopted at 2006-10-17 telecon.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>