<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>3803</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2006-10-05 16:28:16 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Both selector and the rbPointer attributes are base text in rubyRule</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2006-10-10 13:29:07 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>ITS</product>
          <component>ITS tagset</component>
          <version>LastCall</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Windows XP</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords>nonEditorialChange, proposalAccepted, reviewerSatisfied</keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>AfterLC</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Yves Savourel">ysavourel</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Felix Sasaki">fsasaki</assigned_to>
          
          
          

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>12308</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Yves Savourel">ysavourel</who>
    <bug_when>2006-10-05 16:28:16 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>--- Summary of the problem:

Both the selector and the rbPointer attributes are described as selecting the ruby base text.
(See http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/itstagset.html#ruby-implementation)


--- Proposed solution:

We remove the rbPointer attribute. It is currently optional and since its function is currently also implemented with the selector
attribute the implementation does not really change (except that we eliminate a potential conflict). Current example would be still
fine. This would be a bug fix not a substantive change.


The people who attended Today&apos;s teleconference were in agreement with this change. If there is no dissent by Monday (Sep-25,
15:00GMT) the editors will make the change.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>12309</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Yves Savourel">ysavourel</who>
    <bug_when>2006-10-05 16:35:20 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>No objections to removing the rbPointer attribute.
The change has been implemented in the specification.
</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>12310</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Yves Savourel">ysavourel</who>
    <bug_when>2006-10-05 16:35:55 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I&apos;m satisfied.
-yves
</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>12311</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Yves Savourel">ysavourel</who>
    <bug_when>2006-10-05 16:36:42 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Closed</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>12331</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Felix Sasaki">fsasaki</who>
    <bug_when>2006-10-06 01:52:25 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Summary: The Working Group agreed that the functionality of the two attributes is identical and decided to remove the rbPointer attribute.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>