<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>3727</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2006-09-14 17:59:26 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>insufficient testing of deep-equal</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2006-09-26 06:22:36 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>XML Query Test Suite</product>
          <component>XML Query Test Suite</component>
          <version>1.0</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>enhancement</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Per Bothner">per</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Andrew Eisenberg">andrew.eisenberg</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="Mailing list for public feedback on specs from XSL and XML Query WGs">public-qt-comments</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>11728</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Per Bothner">per</who>
    <bug_when>2006-09-14 17:59:26 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The deep-equal function is fairly complex, but there is pretty minimal test coverave.  Most of the tests compare atomic items, and those are useful.  There are a few tests for non-singleton atomic sequences, but not many.  Worst, the few tests for comparing nodes and nodes sequences are pretty useless.  They seesm to fit this pattern:
  deep-equal($input-context1/PATH, $input-context1/PATH)
I.e. the same expression yielding the same *identical* nodes for both arguments.  An implementation that just tests node identity would pass.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>12015</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Andrew Eisenberg">andrew.eisenberg</who>
    <bug_when>2006-09-25 21:13:44 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Thanks for bringing this to our attention. I&apos;ve added test cases fn-deep-equal-node-args-1 to fn-deep-equal-node-args-5 to the test suite. These test cases pass sequences of nodes that do not have the same identity to fn:deep-equal.

Please close this bug report if you agree with this resolution.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>12024</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Per Bothner">per</who>
    <bug_when>2006-09-26 06:22:36 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Yes, this does provide some more meaningful testing.  (It caught one silly bug in the Qexo implementation!)  Thanks.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>