3562 2006-08-01 17:40:38 +0000 Clarify the relation of overlapping definitions in the framework 2006-09-06 17:15:11 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WS-Policy Framework+Attachment FPWD All All RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 public-ws-policy fsasaki public-ws-policy-qa oldest_to_newest 10958 0 public-ws-policy 2006-08-01 17:40:38 +0000 We should clarify the relation of overlapping definitions in the framework / in the attachement document. Justification - Some terms are defined in both documents, see [1] and [2]. People who want to normatively reference these terms should have only one target. Target - The sections at [1] and [2]. Proposal - I see two possibilities: a) Have the term definitions as they are, but adding to one of them a statement like "the normative reference for this definition is at xxx". "xxx" points to the target definition in the other document. b) Have the overlapping definitions only in one document, and pointers in the other. I have no preference for a) or b). Please follow also the thread at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Jul/0045.html (original post of this issue). [1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy-framework.html#Terminology [2] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy-attachement.html#Glossary 11423 1 fsasaki 2006-09-06 17:10:53 +0000 Discussed at http://www.w3.org/2006/07/26-ws-policy-minutes.html. Accepted with an action item http://www.w3.org/2006/07/26-ws-policy-minutes.html#action19 for the editors to implement the change.