3558 2006-08-01 17:18:28 +0000 Remove example of use of domain expressions in section 4.2 2006-08-31 14:35:07 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WS-Policy Attachment FPWD PC Windows XP RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 ashok.malhotra asirveda public-ws-policy-qa oldest_to_newest 10953 0 ashok.malhotra 2006-08-01 17:18:28 +0000 Section 4.2 of the PolicyAttachment document gives an example of a domainExpression. First, this is a non-example as it says little about the domainExpression. In fact, it says less than the example at the end of 3.4. Second, there is no reason for this example to be separated from section 3.4. SUGGESTION: Remove section 4.2. It serves no purpose. 11001 1 ashok.malhotra 2006-08-02 17:43:58 +0000 Confirming that I would like the example in section 4.2 removed. This indeed the psuedo-schema. Here are the two psuedo-schemas: Section 3.4 <wsp:PolicyAttachment … > <wsp:AppliesTo> <x:DomainExpression/> + </wsp:AppliesTo> ( <wsp:Policy>…</wsp:Policy> | <wsp:PolicyReference>…</wsp:PolicyReference> ) + <wsse:Security>…</wsse:Security> ? … </wsp:PolicyAttachment> Section 4.2 <wsp:PolicyAttachment> <wsp:AppliesTo> <wsa:EndpointReference>… </wsa:EndpointReference> </wsp:AppliesTo> ( <wsp:Policy>…</wsp:Policy> | <wsp:PolicyReference>…</wsp:PolicyReference> ) + </wsp:PolicyAttachment> The need for a better example I have added as a separate issue 3557. 11097 2 ashok.malhotra 2006-08-11 21:45:51 +0000 On the August 9, 2006 telcon the WG agreed to close this issue by removing the example from section 4.2. 11098 3 ashok.malhotra 2006-08-11 21:49:08 +0000 The minutes of the August 9 telcon are at http://www.w3.org/2006/08/09-ws-policy-minutes.html