<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>3546</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2006-07-31 17:41:33 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>WSDL 2.0 status recorded in Attachments 1.5 document</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2006-08-31 14:31:51 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>WS-Policy</product>
          <component>Attachment</component>
          <version>FPWD</version>
          <rep_platform>Macintosh</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc>http://www.w3.org/2006/07/13-ws-policy-minutes.html#action01</bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords>needsAgreement</keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Frederick Hirsch">w3c</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Frederick Hirsch">w3c</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="Web Services Policy WG QA List">public-ws-policy-qa</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>10889</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Frederick Hirsch">w3c</who>
    <bug_when>2006-07-31 17:41:33 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The charter includes WSDL 2.0 in scope, so at a later  point we may need to update the Framework document to discuss WSDL  2.0.  In the interim, working drafts should record the status of WSDL  2.0 with respect to the document.

Proposal-

(a) provide status section indicating the status of WSDL 2.0 as  deferred.

Keep this issue open as a reminder to address WSDL 2.0.

At that point  we may choose to incorporate WSDL 2.0 into the contents  of the document structure:

(a) update title of section 4 to be &quot;Attaching Policies using WSDL&quot;
(b) move section 4.2 to be 4.3
(c) add new section 4.2 &quot;Calculating effective policy using WSDL  
2.0&quot;, with TBD as content

At a later point an editors decision may be made to incorporate WSDL  
1.1 and 2.0 material in a single section, or separate section.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>