3515 2006-07-19 17:39:24 +0000 xml:lang = language info, please 2006-10-03 14:54:22 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified ITS ITS tagset WorkingDraft PC Windows XP CLOSED FIXED proposalAccepted, reviewerSatisfied P2 normal AfterLC 1 fsasaki fsasaki fsasaki oldest_to_newest 10624 0 fsasaki 2006-07-19 17:39:24 +0000 Issue #48 of i18nCore comments http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/ We feel that there should be a note in the specification that says that it is implied/understood that xml:lang represents language information wherever it appears. 10778 1 fsasaki 2006-07-25 06:03:30 +0000 Action: working group to discuss and reply. 10839 2 ysavourel 2006-07-27 04:09:59 +0000 Discussed at http://www.w3.org/2006/07/26-i18nits-minutes.html#item16. Proposals http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JulSep/0121.html and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JulSep/0162.html are fine with the working group, but we need to decide whether they would be normative or not (that is if xml:lang should be normative or not for ITS processors). Action: working group to continue discussion. 10912 3 fsasaki 2006-08-01 01:13:49 +0000 Discussed at http://www.w3.org/2006/07/31-i18nits-minutes.html#item04 . Resolution: Agreed to go back to i18n core with the proposals at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JulSep/0121.html and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JulSep/0162.html . We say that processing of xml:lang is not a normative requirement for an ITS implementation. This resolution should resolve the bugs 3468, 3469, 3480 and 3515. 11481 4 fsasaki 2006-09-07 04:03:50 +0000 Action: editors to make the change and Felix to go back to i18n core. 11595 5 fsasaki 2006-09-11 03:48:00 +0000 Wait: response sent. See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JulSep/0331.html 11942 6 ysavourel 2006-09-21 15:43:04 +0000 The text "Applying the Language Information data category to xml:lang attributes using global rules is not necessary, since xml:lang is already defined in terms of RFC3066." has been modified to "Applying the Language Information data category to xml:lang attributes using global rules is not necessary, since xml:lang is already defined in terms of RFC3066 or its successor" to resolve the issue noted by richard at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JulSep/0354.html Wait: response sent. See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JulSep/0394.html 11989 7 fsasaki 2006-09-24 01:56:53 +0000 Closed. Reviewer satisified. See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JulSep/0397.html . 12026 8 fsasaki 2006-09-26 10:43:34 +0000 Reviewer from i18n core satisified as well. See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JulSep/0416.html . 12073 9 fsasaki 2006-09-27 04:47:00 +0000 Closed. 12166 10 fsasaki 2006-09-28 06:59:53 +0000 Summary: The Working Group decided to accept the proposal and to clarify the role of xml:lang.