3510 2006-07-19 17:35:34 +0000 Spell out the attributes 2006-10-03 14:53:28 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified ITS ITS tagset WorkingDraft PC Windows XP CLOSED FIXED proposalAccepted, reviewerSatisfied P2 normal AfterLC 1 fsasaki fsasaki fsasaki oldest_to_newest 10619 0 fsasaki 2006-07-19 17:35:34 +0000 Issue #42 of i18nCore comments http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/ s/As for data category specific attributes like locInfoPointer which point to existing information in the document, a RelativeLocationPath as described in [XPath 1.0] MUST be used. The XPath expression is evaluated relative to the nodes which are selected via the selector attribute./Attributes that point to existing information in the document, ie. attributes whose name ends in ...Pointer, MUST use a RelativeLocationPath as described in [XPath 1.0]. The XPath expression is evaluated relative to the nodes selected by the selector attribute./ 10773 1 fsasaki 2006-07-25 05:59:57 +0000 Action: working group to discuss and reply. 10837 2 ysavourel 2006-07-27 04:00:45 +0000 Resolution: working group agreed with the proposal at http://www.w3.org/2006/07/26-i18nits-minutes.html#item11. (Enumerate the xyzPointer attribute in second bullet of 5.3.1) Action: editors to make the change 11190 3 christian.lieske 2006-08-17 07:41:40 +0000 Wait for update to markup declarations (will result in at least one additional "pointer" attribute; "Basic Concepts" not modified wrt. naming conventions yet 11456 4 fsasaki 2006-09-06 22:21:26 +0000 Action: Felix to make the change for: locNotePointer, langPointer, locNoteRefPointer, termInfoRefPointer, rubyPointer, rbPointer, rtPointer, rpPointer, rbcPointer, rtcPointer, rbspanPointer, termInfoPointer 11598 5 fsasaki 2006-09-11 03:57:07 +0000 Wait: response sent. See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JulSep/0334.html 11749 6 ysavourel 2006-09-14 20:14:55 +0000 Closed. Commenters satisfied see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JulSep/0362.html 12162 7 fsasaki 2006-09-28 06:56:34 +0000 Summary: The Working Group decided to accept the proposal and to list explicitely the "pointer" attributes as desired.