3506 2006-07-19 17:30:40 +0000 Make the application of legacy ruby clearer 2006-10-03 14:52:29 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified ITS ITS tagset WorkingDraft PC Windows XP CLOSED FIXED proposalAccepted, reviewerSatisfied P2 normal AfterLC 1 fsasaki fsasaki fsasaki oldest_to_newest 10615 0 fsasaki 2006-07-19 17:30:40 +0000 Issue #36 of i18nCore comments http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/ It is very poorly explained what the difference is between this and the situation described in the last para of 6.6.2. How about: "Where legacy formats do no contain ruby markup conformant to [Ruby-TR], it is still possible to associate ruby text with a specified range of document content using the rubyRule element." Note also s/and there one wants/and where one wants/ 10769 1 fsasaki 2006-07-25 05:57:33 +0000 Action: working group to discuss and reply. 10835 2 ysavourel 2006-07-27 03:37:02 +0000 Resolution: working group agreed with the proposal at http://www.w3.org/2006/07/26-i18nits-minutes.html#item07 Action: editors to make the change. 11187 3 christian.lieske 2006-08-17 07:25:57 +0000 Comment has been implemented 11452 4 fsasaki 2006-09-06 22:06:11 +0000 Action: Felix to integrate the change. 11591 5 fsasaki 2006-09-11 03:30:56 +0000 Wait: response sent. See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JulSep/0327.html 11743 6 ysavourel 2006-09-14 20:10:13 +0000 Closed. Commenters satisfied see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JulSep/0362.html 12158 7 fsasaki 2006-09-28 06:52:27 +0000 Summary: The Working Group decided to accept the proposal and to clarify the application of legacy ruby.