3467 2006-07-14 20:00:13 +0000 rubyText is an attribute 2006-10-04 03:02:27 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified ITS ITS tagset LastCall PC Windows XP CLOSED FIXED nonEditorialChange, proposalAccepted, reviewerSatisfied P2 normal AfterLC 1 ysavourel fsasaki fsasaki oldest_to_newest 10522 0 ysavourel 2006-07-14 20:00:13 +0000 Issue #37 of i18nCore comments: http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/ Section 6.6.3: Is there a reason an attribute has been used for rubyText, rather than an element? 10736 1 fsasaki 2006-07-24 17:18:00 +0000 Resolution: working group decides to have an element instead of an attribute, see http://www.w3.org/2006/07/17-i18nits-minutes.html#item04 . Action: editors to make the change. 11147 2 christian.lieske 2006-08-16 12:47:25 +0000 ODD schema needed to implement the change 11431 3 fsasaki 2006-09-06 20:11:13 +0000 Action: Felix to make the change. 11592 4 fsasaki 2006-09-11 03:32:48 +0000 Wait: response sent. See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JulSep/0328.html 11744 5 ysavourel 2006-09-14 20:11:30 +0000 Closed. Commenters satisfied see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JulSep/0362.html 12131 6 fsasaki 2006-09-28 06:23:42 +0000 Summary: The Working Group decided to accept the proposal and to have rubyText as an element.