3456 2006-07-14 19:29:32 +0000 Attribute used for locInfo 2006-10-03 14:35:04 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified ITS ITS tagset LastCall PC Windows XP CLOSED FIXED proposalAccepted, reviewerSatisfied P2 normal AfterLC 1 ysavourel fsasaki fsasaki oldest_to_newest 10509 0 ysavourel 2006-07-14 19:29:32 +0000 Comment #6 of i18nCore comments http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/ "We will advise against using attributes for natural language text in the BP doc - we should at least explain why we are doing it here." 10510 1 ysavourel 2006-07-14 19:30:15 +0000 An explanation would not hurt. I would propose to add the following text (as a note) just above Example 26: "It is generally recommended to avoid using attribute to store text, however, in this specific case, the need to provide the notes without interfering with the structure of the host document is outweighing the drawbacks of using an attribute." 10588 2 ysavourel 2006-07-19 15:40:01 +0000 Text with spelling corrections: "It is generally recommended to avoid using attributes to store text, however, in this specific case, the need to provide the notes without interfering with the structure of the host document outweighs the drawbacks of using an attribute." 10711 3 fsasaki 2006-07-24 12:59:04 +0000 I18NCORE comment. Discussed at http://www.w3.org/2006/07/19-i18nits-minutes.html#item11 , but we need to continue the discussion. Action: working group to continue discussion. 10712 4 fsasaki 2006-07-24 12:59:42 +0000 I18NCORE comment. Discussed at http://www.w3.org/2006/07/19-i18nits-minutes.html#item11 , but we need to continue the discussion. Action: working group to continue discussion. 10906 5 fsasaki 2006-08-01 00:52:12 +0000 Discussed at http://www.w3.org/2006/07/31-i18nits-minutes.html#item01 Yves text proposal: "It is generally recommended to avoid using attribute to store text, however, in this specific case, the need to provide the notes without interfering with the structure of the host document is outweighing the drawbacks of using an attribute." Resolution: agreed to go back with the proposal to i18n core WG. 11473 6 fsasaki 2006-09-07 04:00:56 +0000 Action: editors to make the change and Felix to go back to i18n core 11571 7 fsasaki 2006-09-11 02:21:21 +0000 Wait: response sent. See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JulSep/0309.html 11702 8 ysavourel 2006-09-14 03:44:55 +0000 Closed. Commenters satisfied see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JulSep/0362.html 12093 9 fsasaki 2006-09-27 12:44:02 +0000 Summary: The Working Group decided to accept the proposal and added an explanation for the attribute used for locInfo (now called "locNote", see comment http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3460 ).