<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>3330</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2006-06-13 20:26:49 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>lro and rlo explanation</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2006-10-03 14:34:25 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>ITS</product>
          <component>ITS tagset</component>
          <version>LastCall</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Windows XP</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords>proposalAccepted, reviewerSatisfied</keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>AfterLC</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Yves Savourel">ysavourel</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Felix Sasaki">fsasaki</assigned_to>
          <cc>martin</cc>
          
          <qa_contact name="Felix Sasaki">fsasaki</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>10017</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Yves Savourel">ysavourel</who>
    <bug_when>2006-06-13 20:26:49 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Comment from Martin Wunderlich

Regarding the abbreviations lro and rlo it might be good to have a short explanation somewhere in brackets.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>10023</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Felix Sasaki">fsasaki</who>
    <bug_when>2006-06-14 12:14:52 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #0)
&gt; Comment from Martin Wunderlich
&gt; 
&gt; Regarding the abbreviations lro and rlo it might be good to have a short
&gt; explanation somewhere in brackets.
&gt; 

I agree with the comment and would take an action item to prepare a text (with Richard&apos;s help / corrections, if possible).</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>10147</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Felix Sasaki">fsasaki</who>
    <bug_when>2006-06-20 05:24:52 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Added Martin Wunderlich to the CC list.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>10704</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Felix Sasaki">fsasaki</who>
    <bug_when>2006-07-24 12:49:05 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Action: Felix to prepare a text about lro and rlo values of the dir attribute.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>11404</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Felix Sasaki">fsasaki</who>
    <bug_when>2006-09-06 15:03:28 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>summary : for now we refer to CSS 2, and copy the text of XHTML 2, 
 the text explains the different values.
Action:  Richard to check the relation between CSS 2 to CSS 2.1 (due to 13 September)
action: Felix to make the change in the spec (due to 13 September)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>11582</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Felix Sasaki">fsasaki</who>
    <bug_when>2006-09-11 02:59:14 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Hello Martin,

We believe that our response at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JulSep/0319.html resolves your comment . Could you have a look?

Please let us know within 2 weeks if you are satisfied. If we don&apos;t hear
 from you , we will assume this issue as closed.

Regards, Felix
Wait: Reply sent.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>12070</commentid>
    <comment_count>6</comment_count>
    <who name="Felix Sasaki">fsasaki</who>
    <bug_when>2006-09-27 04:42:41 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Closed. No reply.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>12091</commentid>
    <comment_count>7</comment_count>
    <who name="Felix Sasaki">fsasaki</who>
    <bug_when>2006-09-27 12:40:20 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Summary: The Working Group clarified the explanation of the &quot;lro&quot; and &quot;rlo&quot; values.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>12243</commentid>
    <comment_count>8</comment_count>
    <who name="Martin Wunderlich">martin</who>
    <bug_when>2006-10-02 20:38:32 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #7)

Hiya, 

That&apos;s perfect now. Thanks a million!

Kind regards,

Martin


&gt; Summary: The Working Group clarified the explanation of the &quot;lro&quot; and &quot;rlo&quot;
&gt; values.
&gt; </thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>12249</commentid>
    <comment_count>9</comment_count>
    <who name="Felix Sasaki">fsasaki</who>
    <bug_when>2006-10-03 04:04:16 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Summary: The Working Group clarified the explanation of the &quot;lro&quot; and &quot;rlo&quot;
values.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>