3292 2006-05-17 03:04:36 +0000 XHTML Module for XHTML 1.1 or XHTML 2.0 2006-10-03 14:41:28 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified ITS ITS tagset LastCall All All CLOSED FIXED http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-its-20060414/ changeDeclined, reviewerSatisfied P2 normal AfterLC 1 karl fsasaki fsasaki oldest_to_newest 9816 0 karl 2006-05-17 03:04:36 +0000 The content of this document is of great values. I see one direct benefit for XHTML users, but I fear a possible rebuttal by these same users. They will not like to have to use yet another namespace in an XHTML document. Though there might be a possibility. Have you thought about proposing an XHTML Module to the HTML WG (in addition to this work not a replacement)? See "How to create XHTML Family modules and markup languages for fun and profit" http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Guide/xhtml-m12n-tutorial/ 10691 1 fsasaki 2006-07-24 11:53:41 +0000 Action: Working group to discuss the proposal. 11398 2 fsasaki 2006-09-06 14:14:26 +0000 Closed. The modularization is now part of the BP document. 12085 3 fsasaki 2006-09-27 12:35:38 +0000 Summary: The comment does not apply any more since the Working Group handles the topic now in a different document.