3254 2006-05-09 11:12:42 +0000 Consistency of document versions 2006-09-27 14:58:48 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XML Schema Datatypes: XSD Part 2 1.1 only PC Windows XP CLOSED FIXED thimble, easy; do-it cluster resolved P2 normal --- 1 mike cmsmcq www-xml-schema-comments oldest_to_newest 9668 0 mike 2006-05-09 11:12:42 +0000 QT approved comment In 3.3.7, The version of the document with change markings starts the section with a Note, which appears to be absent in the non-change-marked version. (Also, it would be really helpful if the two versions used the same section numbering. I think we achieve this for the QT specs.) 9878 1 davep 2006-05-22 00:55:12 +0000 (In reply to comment #0) > In 3.3.7, The version of the document with change markings starts the section > with a Note, which appears to be absent in the non-change-marked version. The note should be deleted from both version. > (Also, it would be really helpful if the two versions used the same section > numbering. I think we achieve this for the QT specs.) Interesting. Not possible with the existing XSLT. Should the new version retain the old numbering for all old sections? This could lead to non-uniform numbering in the new n-c-m version. 12098 2 davep 2006-09-27 14:50:34 +0000 The markup has been corrected so that the Note in question is shown as deleted in the diff version of the status quo document. Please let us know that you agree with this resolution of your issue, by adding a comment to the issue record and changing the Status of the issue to Closed. (Or, if you do not agree with this resolution, please add a comment explaining why. If you wish to appeal the WG's decision to the Director, then also change the Status of the record to Reopened. If you wish to record your dissent, but do not wish to appeal the decision to the Director, then change the Status of the record to Closed.) If we do not hear from you in the next two weeks, we will assume you agree with the WG decision. 12100 3 mike 2006-09-27 14:58:48 +0000 Fine.