3253 2006-05-09 11:10:30 +0000 Leading plus sign (again) 2008-06-07 07:49:18 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XML Schema Datatypes: XSD Part 2 1.1 only PC Windows XP CLOSED FIXED cluster: numbers resolved P2 normal --- 1 mike cmsmcq www-xml-schema-comments oldest_to_newest 9666 0 mike 2006-05-09 11:10:30 +0000 9667 1 mike 2006-05-09 11:11:19 +0000 QT approved comment In 3.3.5.4, it seems odd that "+1" is allowed and "+INF" is not. 17781 2 David_E3 2007-11-16 16:31:37 +0000 WG decided to allow +INF in the lexical types of all data types that allow INF. 20374 3 cmsmcq 2008-06-04 14:39:04 +0000 A wording proposal to implement the decision recorded in comment #2 is at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-2/datatypes.b3659.html (member-only link). As I post this comment, I learn that one error remains in that proposal, for which I propose the following amendment: in 3.3.5.2 (for float) and 3.3.6.2 (for double), change the right-hand side of the EBNF rule by deleting "minimalNumericalSpecialRep" and inserting "numericalSpecialRep". In D.1.1. optionally merge numericalSpecialRep and minimalNumericalSpecialRep into a single production. (Optional because having two productions is not wrong, it's only unmotivated now.) 20405 4 cmsmcq 2008-06-07 01:20:54 +0000 The proposal mentioned in comment #3 was adopted today. Michael, as the emissary of the QT WGs, we ask you to inform them of this resolution and signal their satisfaction or dissatisfaction with it in the usual way. Thanks.