<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>3246</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2006-05-09 10:46:35 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Leading plus sign</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2006-10-14 08:42:19 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>XML Schema</product>
          <component>Datatypes: XSD Part 2</component>
          <version>1.1 only</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Windows XP</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard>medium, easy, numeric lexical space cluster</status_whiteboard>
          <keywords>decided</keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Michael Kay">mike</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="C. M. Sperberg-McQueen">cmsmcq</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="XML Schema comments list">www-xml-schema-comments</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>9658</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Kay">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2006-05-09 10:46:35 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>QT approved comment:

In 3.3.3.1, the prose appears to allow a leading plus sign in the lexical representation of xs:decimal, but the regular expression does not.

Also note: In 3.3.3.1, the sentence &quot;The mapping from values to ·canonical representations· is given formally in ·decimalCanonicalMap·.&quot; appears redundantly. It belongs (and appears again) in 3.3.3.2.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>9875</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Dave Peterson">davep</who>
    <bug_when>2006-05-20 01:30:48 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #0)

&gt; In 3.3.3.1, the prose appears to allow a leading plus sign in the lexical
&gt; representation of xs:decimal, but the regular expression does not.

The RE is incorrect and should be fixed.

&gt; Also note: In 3.3.3.1, the sentence &quot;The mapping from values to ·canonical
&gt; representations· is given formally in ·decimalCanonicalMap·.&quot; appears
&gt; redundantly. It belongs (and appears again) in 3.3.3.2.

Correct.  It should be removed from 3.3.3.1 .
</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>12021</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Dave Peterson">davep</who>
    <bug_when>2006-09-26 03:30:48 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The WG has approved the correction to the RE as proposed by the reporter; the second part of the reported bug will be dealt with separately by the WG.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>12459</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Dave Peterson">davep</who>
    <bug_when>2006-10-14 02:56:29 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The WG has directed the editors to delete the first instance of the duplicated sentence, as suggested.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>12460</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Dave Peterson">davep</who>
    <bug_when>2006-10-14 03:06:31 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Both points have been added to the status quo document.

Please let us know that you agree with this resolution of your issue, 
by adding a comment to the issue record and changing the Status of 
the issue to Closed.  (Or, if you do not agree with this resolution, 
please add a comment explaining why. If you wish to appeal the WG&apos;s 
decision to the Director, then also change the Status of the record 
to Reopened. If you wish to record your dissent, but do not wish to 
appeal the decision to the Director, then change the Status of the 
record to Closed.)  If we do not hear from you in the next two weeks, 
we will assume you agree with the WG decision.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>