<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>3234</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2006-05-09 10:08:17 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Enumeration facets for lists</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2007-09-19 03:40:18 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>XML Schema</product>
          <component>Datatypes: XSD Part 2</component>
          <version>1.1 only</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Windows XP</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard>medium, easy</status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Michael Kay">mike</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="C. M. Sperberg-McQueen">cmsmcq</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="XML Schema comments list">www-xml-schema-comments</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>9646</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Kay">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2006-05-09 10:08:17 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>QT approved comment:

In 2.6.1.2, there is text explaining the effect of all the constraining
facets except enumeration. It is worth stating that the enumeration facet
also applies to the list as a whole.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>16267</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="David Ezell">David_E3</who>
    <bug_when>2007-08-24 21:17:06 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>On the telcon:
we will resolve issue 3234 by adding the sentence &quot;Similarly, enumeration values must be lists, not list items.&quot; as requested (to be drafted) 
</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>16268</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Dave Peterson">davep</who>
    <bug_when>2007-08-25 00:12:12 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #1)
&gt; On the telcon:
&gt; we will resolve issue 3234 by adding the sentence &quot;Similarly, enumeration
&gt; values must be lists, not list items.&quot; as requested (to be drafted) 

Inasmuch as the sentence is drafted (herein), this bug should be marked &quot;decided&quot;; the resolution is awaiting incorporation in the SQ document.

</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>16682</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="C. M. Sperberg-McQueen">cmsmcq</who>
    <bug_when>2007-09-19 03:40:18 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The change in comment #1 has now been reflected into the status-quo version
of the Datatypes spec.  So I&apos;m closing the issue.

Mike, you know the drill.  If we don&apos;t hear from QT by 19 October,
we&apos;ll assume you&apos;re happy with the resolution.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>