<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>3077</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2006-04-04 17:22:47 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Editorial nit</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2007-09-26 15:38:39 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>XML Schema</product>
          <component>Datatypes: XSD Part 2</component>
          <version>1.1 only</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Windows XP</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords>decided, editorial</keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>minor</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Fran">francois</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="C. M. Sperberg-McQueen">cmsmcq</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="XML Schema comments list">www-xml-schema-comments</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>9029</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Fran">francois</who>
    <bug_when>2006-04-04 17:22:47 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Section 3.3.7, 1st para: (Editorial) The sentence ending &apos;&quot;15 days
ending 12 July 1995&quot; are not.&apos; is not exactly clear, should be clarified
by saying for example &apos;are not duration values.&apos;</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>11541</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="C. M. Sperberg-McQueen">cmsmcq</who>
    <bug_when>2006-09-09 00:43:39 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Thank you.  I agree both with your diagnosis and with your suggested
cure for the sentence, and have made the change in the XML source.

Please let us know if you agree with this resolution of your issue, 
by adding a comment to the issue record and changing the Status of 
the issue to Closed. Or, if you do not agree with this resolution, 
please add a comment explaining why. If you wish to appeal the WG&apos;s 
decision to the Director, then also change the Status of the record 
to Reopened. If you wish to record your dissent, but do not wish to 
appeal the decision to the Director, then change the Status of the 
record to Closed. If we do not hear from you in the next two weeks, 
we will assume you agree with the WG decision.
</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>12620</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Dave Peterson">davep</who>
    <bug_when>2006-10-27 16:56:13 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The agreed-upon correction is not yet visible in the Status Quo document</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>16679</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="C. M. Sperberg-McQueen">cmsmcq</who>
    <bug_when>2007-09-19 03:14:55 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The repair for this problem has now been integrated into the status-quo
version of the draft specification at 
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-2/datatypes.diff-1.0.html#duration
(member-only link).
</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>16809</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Dave Peterson">davep</who>
    <bug_when>2007-09-26 15:38:39 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Inasmuch as we have implemented the fix he recommended, I&apos;m assuming he concurs and am marking this bug CLOSED.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>