<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>3059</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2006-03-29 17:01:23 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Reference to RFC 3023 needs revision</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2006-04-26 22:59:33 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>XPath / XQuery / XSLT</product>
          <component>XSLT 2.0</component>
          <version>Candidate Recommendation</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="C. M. Sperberg-McQueen">cmsmcq</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Michael Kay">mike</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="Mailing list for public feedback on specs from XSL and XML Query WGs">public-qt-comments</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>8945</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="C. M. Sperberg-McQueen">cmsmcq</who>
    <bug_when>2006-03-29 17:01:23 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The Other References of XSLT 2.0
(http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/#other-references) include
a refererence to RFC 3023.

RFC 3023 was published in January 2001, and while I do not 
find an expiration date in the text, it is subject to
obsolescence and replacement by a newer RFC, and indeed there
are reports that a new version of the RFC is in preparation.

I think the reference should be changed to specify 
RFC 3023 or its successor(s) on the IETF standards track.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>9308</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Kay">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2006-04-19 18:36:27 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The comment was accepted. In fact, the change had already been made to the editor&apos;s draft on the basis of a previous decision of the joint WGs.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>