300 2003-08-27 07:38:51 +0000 Add Explicit Support for WML 2004-05-16 10:19:57 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Validator check 0.6.1 All All RESOLVED WONTFIX http://www.w3.org/mid/20030725124505.GB8339@haunter.student.utwente.nl P2 enhancement 0.6.5b2 1 link link oldest_to_newest 698 0 link 2003-08-27 07:38:51 +0000 From Niek Bergboer <niek@bergboer.net>: I was wondering whether the W3C validator could be made a recognize WML DTDs. That is to say: I can validate a WML document perfectly, but whereas e.g. for XHTML 1.1 documents the validator says, in clear English, "This page is valid XHTML 1.1!", for WML it just mentions that it conforms to the given DTD. Note that this is merely a presentation issue. But IMO it would be nice to have the validator say, e.g., "This page is valid WML 1.1!". For e.g. XHTML 1.1 the validator makes the following "mapping": <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd"> ==> Means "XHTML 1.1" Would it be possible to have it make the following mapping? <!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN" "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml"> ==> Means WML 1.1 1843 1 link 2004-05-16 06:19:57 +0000 WML is getting increasingly irrelevant.