2995 2006-03-09 02:21:27 +0000 orderDecl-2 depends on undefined document order 2006-03-11 01:29:09 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XML Query Test Suite XML Query Test Suite 0.8.6 PC Linux CLOSED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 per carmelo oldest_to_newest 8642 0 per 2006-03-09 02:21:27 +0000 The expression in orderDecl-2.xq: (<a>1</a>) union (<b>2</b>) results in the nodes <a>1</a> and <b>2</b> in document order, since there is a 'ordering ordered' declaration. But that since the "document order" in this case is implementation defined, the result is still indeterminate. (I searched for previous bugs with union or orderDecl, but didn't find one.) 8667 1 carmelo 2006-03-10 20:20:56 +0000 Per: I am not sure that I agree with with you. From the Query specs "Ordering mode affects the behavior of path expressions that include a "/" or "//" operator or an axis step; union, intersect, ..." Why will it still indeterminate? Carmelo 8668 2 per 2006-03-10 20:37:17 +0000 The ordering mode specifies that the result of union is in document order. That is not indeterminate. However, document order itself is indeterminate (or implementation dependent) in this case, the since the constructed element nodes do not share a common ancestor. 8673 3 carmelo 2006-03-10 21:34:37 +0000 Per: Correct. Submitted a second set of expect results. Please close the bug if in agreement and able to verify. Thanks, Carmelo 8680 4 per 2006-03-11 01:29:09 +0000 I can't really "verify" the fix it until I get the next version of the testsuite, or at least a patch. But I might as well close it anyway.