29912 2016-10-04 17:38:37 +0000 [XP31] Prepublication check of XP31: Conformance (section 4) 2016-11-01 19:04:49 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XPath / XQuery / XSLT XPath 3.1 Candidate Recommendation PC All RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 mike jonathan.robie josh.spiegel public-qt-comments oldest_to_newest 127654 0 mike 2016-10-04 17:38:37 +0000 1. "If a language is described as an extension or XPath" Typo s/or/of. 2. I hate to revisit this troubled water but it is not clear why we are referring to RFC 2119 if we then go on to the terms MUST, MAY, SHOULD ourselves. 3. I think the term SHOULD is defined but never used. 127655 1 mike 2016-10-04 17:39:23 +0000 2. should read "I hate to revisit this troubled water but it is not clear why we are referring to RFC 2119 if we then go on to define the terms MUST, MAY, SHOULD ourselves. 128017 2 josh.spiegel 2016-11-01 19:04:49 +0000 Thanks. I fixed the typo and conditionally removed SHOULD from XPath. However, I did not remove the definitions since I am not familiar with the troubled waters you mentioned and the definitions appear consistent with the RFC. If you are unsatisfied with this, please reopen the bug and I will leave it for Jonathan who may be more familiar with the history here.