29678 2016-06-01 12:15:16 +0000 [QT3TS] same-key-006 2016-06-17 10:02:11 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XPath / XQuery / XSLT XQuery 3 & XPath 3 Test Suite Candidate Recommendation PC Windows NT RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 tim oneil andrew_coleman josh.spiegel mike public-qt-comments oldest_to_newest 126632 0 tim 2016-06-01 12:15:16 +0000 According to XQ31, the xs:decimal type minimum value for the maximum number of decimal digits (totalDigits facet) is 18. The test same-key-006 requires greater precision than is required by the specification. xs:decimal("1.00000000000000000000000000000000001") 126633 1 josh.spiegel 2016-06-01 13:06:17 +0000 Would you like an alternate result? FOCA0001? 126634 2 tim 2016-06-01 13:53:07 +0000 (In reply to Josh Spiegel from comment #1) > Would you like an alternate result? FOCA0001? Either that, or reduce the decimals to use the minimum 18 digits. xs:decimal("1.00000000000000001") xs:decimal("1.00000000000000002") I have to say, I'm struggling with a few of these tests as there is no built-in arbitrary (or sufficiently high) precision decimal in .NET to which I can convert a double, float or integer/decimal. 126635 3 josh.spiegel 2016-06-01 14:07:09 +0000 I guess that would work too since they still map to the same double. > I have to say, I'm struggling with a few of these tests as there is no built-in arbitrary (or sufficiently high) precision decimal Mike suggested at some point that implementations like yours could fake it by using strings. It sounds plausible to me but I haven't fully thought it through. 126639 4 mike 2016-06-02 07:52:41 +0000 We're off-topic here, but some people recommend using the J# library. We're having to use a 3rd party library for xs:decimal in our Javascript product, it's not the end of the world... 126640 5 tim 2016-06-02 08:31:10 +0000 (In reply to Michael Kay from comment #4) > We're off-topic here, but some people recommend using the J# library. > > We're having to use a 3rd party library for xs:decimal in our Javascript > product, it's not the end of the world... I'm going to ask for this to be put on the agenda for next week. I'll post to the mailing list my thoughts on the subject. 126787 6 andrew_coleman 2016-06-17 10:02:11 +0000 At the meeting on 2016-06-14, the WG agreed to adopt the solution in comment #2. Action A-646-04 will track this.