29673 2016-05-27 19:57:35 +0000 [XSLT30] small typos in the section on classifying expressions 2016-10-06 18:42:16 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XPath / XQuery / XSLT XSLT 3.0 Member-only Editors Drafts PC Windows NT CLOSED FIXED P2 editorial --- 1 abel.braaksma mike public-qt-comments oldest_to_newest 126620 0 abel.braaksma 2016-05-27 19:57:35 +0000 In section 19.8.8 Classifying Expressions, bottom of the list, there are a few entries with references to the production rule that start with a comma (,). MapConstructor [,69] Lookup (Postfix [,49] and Unary [,53]) ArrowExpr [,29] SquareArrayConstructor [,74] CurlyArrayConstructor [,75] I think the comma is superfluous, unless it was intended to signify these productions only appear in XP31. 126621 1 abel.braaksma 2016-05-27 20:20:34 +0000 Note, the same happens in 19.1 Determining the Static Type of a Construct (bottom of the table). 126656 2 mike 2016-06-02 20:14:00 +0000 The notation used was chosen deliberately to highlight the absence of a production rule in XPath 3.0 126715 3 mike 2016-06-09 16:31:20 +0000 Decided it would probably be best to use an ndash or mdash. Note also a small typo above the table: For “also given for new constructs introduced by XPath 3.1..” read “also given for new constructs introduced by XPath 3.1.” - doubled full stop. 126720 4 mike 2016-06-09 22:27:29 +0000 Replaced the notation [,91] by [-,91] where the "-" is an en dash. No change log entry.