<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>29460</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2016-02-15 09:36:10 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>External (non-XSLT) packages</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2016-10-06 21:48:13 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>XPath / XQuery / XSLT</product>
          <component>XSLT 3.0</component>
          <version>Candidate Recommendation</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Michael Kay">mike</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Michael Kay">mike</assigned_to>
          <cc>abel.braaksma</cc>
          
          <qa_contact name="Mailing list for public feedback on specs from XSL and XML Query WGs">public-qt-comments</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>125025</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Kay">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2016-02-15 09:36:10 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Originally raised on email, see https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsl-wg/2016Jan/0002.html

We dropped the XQuery Invocation Feature through bug 29251 (its changes have not been logged, I reported that as an editorial bug here: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29375).

We know that how a package is located and presented is implementation defined. It can be a compiled package etc, etc. However, I think it makes sense to add a little Note somewhere that strongly suggests that an implementation is free to offer a package written in any language. The way we currently describe it seems to suggest that only a package with xsl:package is allowed, but a package can just as well be written in a different language (C#, Python, Java) or be an XQuery module (presented by the processor using the proper package manifest structure).

This is not a bug in the spec, but it can help readers to understand that a package is a more abstract concept.

Cheers,
Abel</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>125075</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Kay">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2016-02-16 09:17:41 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Suggestion: Addition to the intro section in 2.7

Although this specification defines packages as constructs written using a defined XSLT syntax, implementations MAY provide mechanisms that allow packages to be written using other languages.

Change the penult para of 2.7 to start &quot;A package is defined *in XSLT* by....&quot;, then add the above para after it.

Resolved to accept this wording.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>125180</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Abel Braaksma">abel.braaksma</who>
    <bug_when>2016-02-20 15:00:44 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Was this updated in the spec or was it snowed under by the other bug reports?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>127677</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Abel Braaksma">abel.braaksma</who>
    <bug_when>2016-10-06 21:48:13 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to Abel Braaksma from comment #2)
&gt; Was this updated in the spec or was it snowed under by the other bug reports?
Reply to my own comment: the changes are visible in the current WD, search for this bug number to see the changes.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>