2935 2006-02-24 07:50:32 +0000 processing expectations for ruby / directionality 2006-07-24 10:01:33 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified ITS ITS tagset WorkingDraft PC Windows XP CLOSED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 fsasaki fsasaki fsasaki oldest_to_newest 8436 0 fsasaki 2006-02-24 07:50:32 +0000 We need to define normative processing expecations for (the visualization of) ruby and directionality. Currently, ruby references the w3c ruby tr and opendoc informally, and directionality references XHTML2 formally. This is uncoherent. There is no need to define these processing expecations as a mandatory part of an "product of ITS". 9191 1 ysavourel 2006-04-13 03:05:26 +0000 This issue seems to be addressed in the latest draft: the conformance section refers to XHTML2 directionality and ruby TR, aren't they? (clause 2-5). Or am I missing something? 9195 2 fsasaki 2006-04-13 06:21:18 +0000 (In reply to comment #1) > This issue seems to be addressed in the latest draft: the conformance section > refers to XHTML2 directionality and ruby TR, aren't they? (clause 2-5). > Or am I missing something? > No, I also think this is resolved. We only have to make clear in the draft what kind of conformance applies to global ruby / directionality? If nobody protests, I would say: the same as for other data categories, e.g. related to selection. What do others think? 9338 3 fsasaki 2006-04-20 08:17:32 +0000 closed at http://www.w3.org/2006/04/18-i18nits-minutes.html#item03 , only discuss again if there are comments from outside. 10667 4 fsasaki 2006-07-24 10:01:33 +0000 Closed, no further action necessary.