29341 2015-12-17 16:34:59 +0000 [XP31] "Unreadable" sounds too strong and opinionating, for lack of a better word 2015-12-18 11:15:45 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XPath / XQuery / XSLT XPath 3.1 Candidate Recommendation PC Windows NT RESOLVED MOVED P2 editorial --- 1 abel.braaksma jonathan.robie public-qt-comments oldest_to_newest 124452 0 abel.braaksma 2015-12-17 16:34:59 +0000 (OT: the online translator gave "ballyhoo" for the Dutch "stemmingmakerij", but I doubt that's a proper expression. I just mean to say that the word, as used in that sentence, reads as the view of the writer, which I think we should try to prevent.) Section 3.22 Arrow operator: This syntax is particularly helpful when conventional function call syntax is unreadable... I prefer something like: This syntax is particularly helpful when conventional function call syntax may make code harder to read.... Perhaps I'm a bit over-pedantic, not a big deal I guess, but I find "unreadable" quite strong, besides, we have lived with this older syntax for over a decade and managed quite well ;). 124474 1 abel.braaksma 2015-12-18 11:15:45 +0000 This is now addressed under #29346. Not a duplicate, so I resolve this as MOVED.