<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>29266</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2015-11-06 13:11:38 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Incorrect example for array:sort</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2016-03-22 09:57:49 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>XPath / XQuery / XSLT</product>
          <component>Functions and Operators 3.1</component>
          <version>Working drafts</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Adam Retter">adam</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Michael Kay">mike</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="Mailing list for public feedback on specs from XSL and XML Query WGs">public-qt-comments</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>124114</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Adam Retter">adam</who>
    <bug_when>2015-11-06 13:11:38 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I think the second example given for array:sort in XPath F+O 3.1 may be incorrect in both the latest public and latest internal drafts.

The example given in the spec is:

The expression array:sort([1, -2, 5, 10, -10, 10, 8], fn:abs#1) returns (1, -2, 5, 8, 10, -10).


However, if I am not mistaken then the return value should actually be:

[1, -2, 5, 8, 10, -10, 10]


That is to say that (1) the example is missing a value in the return array, and (2) that in the example the result is shown as a sequence however it should be an array.

Cheers Adam.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>124246</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Kay">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2015-11-17 16:28:58 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>It was agreed that the example should be corrected, and the change has been applied.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>