2911 2006-02-22 03:08:22 +0000 Editorial WD 2006-02-17: pattern valid 2006-10-30 12:37:05 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XML Schema Datatypes: XSD Part 2 1.1 only Macintosh All CLOSED FIXED thimble, easy decided P2 normal --- 1 xan.gregg cmsmcq www-xml-schema-comments oldest_to_newest 8378 0 xan.gregg 2006-02-22 03:08:22 +0000 In "4.3.4.4 pattern Validation Rules", under "Validation Rule: pattern valid", the sentence "A ·literal· in a ·lexical space· is facet-valid with respect to ·pattern· if ..." should use "pattern-valid" instead of "facet-valid". Not sure about the hyphen. I can't say I understand why a hyphen is used for facet-valid rather than, say, making it a real term and using "·facet valid·". 11959 1 cmsmcq 2006-09-22 13:21:44 +0000 I'm not quite sure whether to say (draft A, as suggested): Validation Rule: pattern valid A ·literal· in a ·lexical space· is pattern-valid if and only if for each ·regular expression· in its {value}, the ·literal· is among the set of character sequences denoted by the ·regular expression·. or (draft B): Validation Rule: pattern valid A ·literal· in a ·lexical space· is pattern-valid (or: facet-valid with respect to ·pattern·) if and only if for each ·regular expression· in its {value}, the ·literal· is among the set of character sequences denoted by the ·regular expression·. I lean toward B, to ensure that we can refer to correctness vis-a-vis any facet X as being 'facet-valid with respect to X'. (Even if in practice we don't refer to pattern that way right now.) 12344 2 davep 2006-10-06 16:26:40 +0000 (In reply to comment #1) > or (draft B): > > Validation Rule: pattern valid > > A ·literal· in a ·lexical space· is pattern-valid (or: facet-valid > with respect to ·pattern·) if and only if for each ·regular > expression· in its {value}, the ·literal· is among the set of > character sequences denoted by the ·regular expression·. Wording B was accepted by the WG and will be entered into the status quo document. 12657 3 davep 2006-10-30 03:22:41 +0000 (In reply to comment #2) > Wording B was accepted by the WG and will be entered into the status quo > document. Wording B was entered into the status quo document on 6 Oct. Please let us know if you agree with this resolution of your issue, by adding a comment to the issue record and changing the Status of the issue to Closed. Or, if you do not agree with this resolution, please add a comment explaining why. If you wish to appeal the WG's decision to the Director, then also change the Status of the record to Reopened. If you wish to record your dissent, but do not wish to appeal the decision to the Director, then change the Status of the record to Closed. If we do not hear from you in the next two weeks, we will assume you agree with the WG decision. 12659 4 xan.gregg 2006-10-30 12:37:05 +0000 Accepted; marking closed.