<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>28868</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2015-06-30 12:38:24 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Fig 1 error?</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2015-07-06 13:47:56 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>HTML WG</product>
          <component>HTML/XHTML Compatibility Authoring Guide (ed: Eliot Graff)</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>NEW</bug_status>
          <resolution></resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc>http://www.w3.org/TR/html-polyglot/#raw-text-elements</bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P3</priority>
          <bug_severity>editorial</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Simon Grant">asimong</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="This bug has no owner yet - up for the taking">dave.null</assigned_to>
          <cc>asimong</cc>
    
    <cc>eliotgra</cc>
    
    <cc>mike</cc>
    
    <cc>public-html-admin</cc>
    
    <cc>public-html-wg-issue-tracking</cc>
          
          <qa_contact name="HTML WG Bugzilla archive list">public-html-bugzilla</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>121534</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Simon Grant">asimong</who>
    <bug_when>2015-06-30 12:38:24 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The table in Fig 1 has
]]&gt;	end of CDATA declaration	uninterpreted	uninterpreted	interpreted (ends CDATA block)

Should it be that INSIDE a CDATA section it is interpreted as the end of the section, OUTSIDE a CDATA section it is uninterpreted?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>121810</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael[tm] Smith">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2015-07-06 12:56:12 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I&apos;ll leave this bug open but be aware that this document is no longer being maintained and shouldn&apos;t actually be used any longer for anything.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>121813</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Simon Grant">asimong</who>
    <bug_when>2015-07-06 13:38:30 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I first saw this on the dev version -- sorry, that was no longer relevant. I have the same question here.

In Fig 1. I would have thought that the row
]]&gt;	end of CDATA declaration	uninterpreted	uninterpreted	interpreted (ends CDATA block)
should rather be
]]&gt;	end of CDATA declaration	uninterpreted	interpreted (ends CDATA block)	uninterpreted

I guess people will understand what is right, but it&apos;s confusing anyway and it would be great to get it straight.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>121814</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael[tm] Smith">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2015-07-06 13:47:56 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to Simon Grant from comment #2)
&gt; I guess people will understand what is right, but it&apos;s confusing anyway and
&gt; it would be great to get it straight.

The message we rightly should be sending to readers about this document right now is just: Don&apos;t use. At all.

I will work on getting the /TR document and Editor&apos;s Draft both updated to say that.

Actually, the broader message we need to be sending is

* Don&apos;t try to make polyglot documents.
* That is, don&apos;t try to make documents that can be parsed by XML parsers and by HTML parsers (because there are too many things that can go wrong)

That&apos;s the message that many people over many years suggested we make a long time ago. Unfortunately we had other people who thought it was a good idea to encourage authors to try it, so this spec ended up getting made.

But now as you can see the people thought this spec was such a great idea have since abandoned it and we&apos;re now stuck with cleaning up the mess they left behind.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>