2883 2006-02-15 11:22:27 +0000 Reword reference to "Localization Properties" in "Out-of-scope" section 2006-07-24 09:06:51 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified ITS ITS tagset WorkingDraft PC Windows XP CLOSED FIXED http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JanMar/0188.html P2 normal LastCall20May 1 christian.lieske fsasaki fsasaki oldest_to_newest 8271 0 christian.lieske 2006-02-15 11:22:27 +0000 8280 1 christian.lieske 2006-02-16 09:59:24 +0000 I suggest a different way to talk about "XML Localization Properties" since to me the existing one might be to abstract: === This standard does does not cover exhaustively cover all mechanisms and data formats which might be needed for configuring XML localization workflows or tools. These mechanisms and data format, sometimes called XML Localization Properties, however, possibly may be implemented by the framework put forth in this standard. In particular, Section 3: Selection of ITS information may provide valuable ideas. === FS> not implemented, since it seems to me that the localization property issue has no common understanding in the group yet. 8944 2 ysavourel 2006-03-29 16:58:32 +0000 In order to close this issue we need to make sure everyone is on the same wave length about "XML localization properties". This is one of the discussion topic for this week. My definition of the term "XML localization properties" (I think in accord with Christian's) would be something like: "XML localization properties" is a generic term to name the mechanisms and data formats that allows localization tools to be configured in order to process a specific XML format. Example of "XML localization properties" are: the "Trados DTD Settings" file, the SDLX "Analysis" file. So I would agree with Christian's wording (after removing one 'cover' and one 'does' from the first line). 9076 3 ysavourel 2006-04-07 19:42:13 +0000 Resolution: See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006AprJun/0016.html Christian's text is integrated in the latest draft. 10658 4 fsasaki 2006-07-24 09:03:57 +0000 Closed, no further action necessary. 10659 5 fsasaki 2006-07-24 09:06:51 +0000 This is a test if the QA contact change worked.