28592 2015-05-01 19:49:28 +0000 Conflicting @@iterator symbols between indexed attributes/getters and maplike/setlike 2019-03-07 15:21:46 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WebAppsWG WebIDL unspecified PC Windows NT RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 kyle cam bzbarsky d mike Ms2ger public-script-coord public-webapps-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 120037 0 kyle 2015-05-01 19:49:28 +0000 Assuming an interface is both maplike/setlike and an indexed attribute/getter, both cases will require an @@iterator symbol, but the spec does not make clear whether there should be a tiebreak or whether this case should not be permitted at all. 120038 1 d 2015-05-01 19:53:54 +0000 Given that we do not want to encouraged further indexed attributes or getters, I think we should just disallow maplike/setlike from being used on interfaces that use those features. 120039 2 bzbarsky 2015-05-01 20:18:56 +0000 It's worth thinking about how you'd spec HTMLCollection today. That's the one case I can think of that's more or less something maplike with an indexed getter. 120040 3 d 2015-05-01 20:21:54 +0000 Probably like https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#element-collections :). (To get named access use `.query("#x, [name='x']")`) 129613 4 Ms2ger 2019-03-07 15:21:46 +0000 https://github.com/heycam/webidl/commit/57125df7f96f837ff299ce8dd4241a56282dcdc1