28360 2015-03-28 18:56:50 +0000 Add a RequestContext entry for <applet> 2015-07-27 14:04:38 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WHATWG Fetch unspecified PC All RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal Unsorted 28384 1 ehsan annevk mike sideshowbarker+fetchspec oldest_to_newest 119010 0 ehsan 2015-03-28 18:56:50 +0000 <applet> can also initiate fetches, so we should probably add a RequestContext entry for it. Or at least a recommendation for how the implementors are supposed to reflect it. 119056 1 annevk 2015-03-30 10:03:52 +0000 Does <applet> initiate the fetches or is it the Java runtime? 119066 2 ehsan 2015-03-30 15:21:10 +0000 The UA may need to download the Java applet before invoking the Java runtime if it's specified using the codebase attribute, but <applet> can also refer to locally existing Java classes. 119130 3 annevk 2015-03-31 10:57:46 +0000 Is that cross-browser? https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/obsolete.html#the-applet-element does not mention any fetching. 119131 4 annevk 2015-03-31 10:58:44 +0000 Reusing "plugin" for this might be good enough? 119154 5 ehsan 2015-03-31 16:28:24 +0000 (In reply to Anne from comment #3) > Is that cross-browser? > https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/obsolete.html#the-applet-element does > not mention any fetching. I don't know, but the spec doesn't really look sufficiently detailed. (In reply to Anne from comment #4) > Reusing "plugin" for this might be good enough? "plugin" means a fetch from within a plugin (right?), which doesn't sound exactly right here. 122294 6 annevk 2015-07-27 14:04:38 +0000 https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/commit/5fe3a2dd90be0c164b8d81655ba0714c9979f5f6 I guess we can figure out later how all browsers implement this. Given that CSP places requirements on <applet> too, this makes sense for now.