<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>28276</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2015-03-23 00:26:06 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>[XP3.1] 2 Basics &quot;atomic type?&quot;</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2015-07-10 21:28:40 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>XPath / XQuery / XSLT</product>
          <component>XPath 3.1</component>
          <version>Candidate Recommendation</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>minor</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Patrick Durusau">patrick</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Jonathan Robie">jonathan.robie</assigned_to>
          <cc>jim.melton</cc>
    
    <cc>mike</cc>
          
          <qa_contact name="Mailing list for public feedback on specs from XSL and XML Query WGs">public-qt-comments</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>118793</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Patrick Durusau">patrick</who>
    <bug_when>2015-03-23 00:26:06 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>2 Basics

3rd paragraph:

&quot;[Definition: An atomic value is a value in the value space of an atomic type, as defined in [XML Schema 1.0] or [XML Schema 1.1].]&quot;

XML Schema 1.0 - &quot;Atomic type&quot; appears once in part 1, 3.14.1, which is marked as non-normative.


XML Schema 1.1 &quot;Atomic type appears once in part 1, 3.16.1, which is a normative section.

The lack of structure prevents more exact referencing. 

Atomic type does not appear at all in part 2 of either XML Schema 1.0 or 1.1 (If you are thinking of anyAtomicType, close but no prize)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>118858</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Kay">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2015-03-23 08:39:38 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>XSD 1.1 part 2 calls them &quot;atomic datatypes&quot; and in a note says that &quot;type&quot; and &quot;datatype&quot; are synonymous.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>121955</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Jonathan Robie">jonathan.robie</who>
    <bug_when>2015-07-10 21:28:40 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I agree with Mike Kay.  I believe this is editorial, and I don&apos;t see a way to improve this editorially, so I&apos;m closing this.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>