28262 2015-03-22 00:13:50 +0000 [webvtt] 4.3.2 emphasis spans [I18N-ISSUE-428] 2016-11-10 20:12:56 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified TextTracks CG WebVTT unspecified PC All RESOLVED MOVED widereview P2 normal --- 1 silviapfeiffer1 dave.null addison ishida philipj silviapfeiffer1 singer www-international zcorpan public-texttracks oldest_to_newest 118774 0 silviapfeiffer1 2015-03-22 00:13:50 +0000 Feedback by Addison Phillips from W3C I18N group: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tt/2015Mar/0061.html I18N comment: https://www.w3.org/International/track/issues/428 4.3.2 WebVTT cue text http://www.w3.org/TR/webvtt1/#webvtt-cue-text A variety of spanning mechanisms, such as bold, italic, and underline are provided. Some languages use different emphasis forms. Should these emphasis types also be provided? We advise against presentational markup of this kind, since it isn't interoperable across writing systems and may cause unnecessary problems for localization. (The HTML5 specification has also proposed that these tags should be used more along semantic lines.) In the HTML case, there was a legacy issue, but here we don't see one, and recommend instead that styling be used to determine the presentation of the text. For some of the issues associated with <b> and <i> tags, see http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-b-and-i-tags 118842 1 philipj 2015-03-23 03:36:53 +0000 This is posed as a question, "Should these emphasis types also be provided?", which I don't know the answer to. The default style of <i> and <b> can be overridden, and we have the more generic (like <span>) <c>: http://www.w3.org/TR/webvtt1/#dfn-webvtt-cue-class-span Is that sufficient, or is there a concrete suggestion for change? 118920 2 singer 2015-03-24 21:55:09 +0000 I think it's worth noting that basic markup like this was wanted without having to use a style sheet at all. As noted, if you do have styling support, the actual behavior can be overridden. Perhaps we could have picked more generic terms (like 'strong'), but... 121495 3 silviapfeiffer1 2015-06-27 12:18:58 +0000 I'm going to close this since it's possible to work around it just like in HTML. 124000 4 zcorpan 2015-10-30 04:17:31 +0000 https://github.com/w3c/webvtt/issues/228 127728 5 singer 2016-10-11 17:58:47 +0000 You can style <b> <i> etc. with CSS for your language. 127750 6 ishida 2016-10-12 12:28:43 +0000 That rather misses the point made in the article linked to above, which explains how using these presentational tags reduces the ability to distinguish semantic differences that are styled *differently* in other languages. Is this bug not now handled in https://github.com/w3c/webvtt/issues/228 ? The threads on this and other issues seem to be diverging between bugzilla and github, which is taking up a lot of time when i try to track things. Can we not close these bugs and point to github issues? 128140 7 singer 2016-11-10 20:12:56 +0000 unfortunately we're using the status of these bugs to tell whether we've resolved all the wide-review issues, so I prefer to see 'closed' to mean only 'dealt with' rather than 'transferred to GitHub'