2802 2006-02-06 15:42:16 +0000 Public/system IDs on Notation 2009-04-21 19:21:42 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XML Schema Structures: XSD Part 1 1.1 only All All CLOSED FIXED thimble, easy resolved P4 normal --- 4000 1 sandygao cmsmcq www-xml-schema-comments oldest_to_newest 8126 0 sandygao 2006-02-06 15:42:20 +0000 1. In the mapping rules for notation 3.12.2 {public identifier} The ·actual value· of the public [attribute] Since "public" is now optional, shouldn't the above rule be changed to something similar to "system"? {system identifier} The ·actual value· of the system [attribute], if present, otherwise ·absent·. 2. In the description of the properties 3.12.1 {system identifier} Optional if {public identifier} is present... {public identifier} Optional if {system identifier} is present... So it seems that at least one of "public" and "system" attributes must be present in the schema document. This may warrant a clause in "Notation Definition Representation OK". 12996 1 sandygao 2006-11-22 05:22:45 +0000 Proposal: to adopt the suggestion for #1. About #2, we don't normally repeat a state the same rule as both a component constraint and a representation one. The component constraint is sufficient. So no change for #2. Resolution: adopted at 2006-10-17 telecon.