27876 2015-01-21 15:49:02 +0000 [Shadow] It is not defined what event.path actually should return 2015-01-23 05:15:58 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WebAppsWG HISTORICAL - Component Model unspecified PC Linux RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 bugs hayato hayato mike public-webapps public-webapps-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 117393 0 bugs 2015-01-21 15:49:02 +0000 "a copy of the event path for the context object" in unclear. There is no such thin as Event's event path. There is Event and there is event path but specs don't seem to actually make clear mapping between those. (1) What is the value when the event hasn't been dispatched? I assume empty array. (2) What is the value during event dispatch I assume the event target chain which was created before capture phase (and changes to the DOM don't actually affect to this). (3) what is the value after the event has been dispatched? empty array? The same as in (2)? 117422 1 hayato 2015-01-22 08:08:25 +0000 Thanks. Let me make it clear in the spec. The short answers are: (In reply to Olli Pettay from comment #0) > "a copy of the event path for the context object" in unclear. > There is no such thin as Event's event path. > There is Event and there is event path but specs don't seem to actually > make clear mapping between those. > > (1) What is the value when the event hasn't been dispatched? > I assume empty array That should be an empty array. > (2) What is the value during event dispatch > I assume the event target chain which was created before capture phase > (and changes to the DOM don't actually affect to this). Exactly. > (3) what is the value after the event has been dispatched? > empty array? The same as in (2)? The same as in (2). 117425 2 hayato 2015-01-22 09:02:23 +0000 Make it clear at https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/commit/f549a79f82bd27b5c605030e3db78df18fc51a12 Olli, could you take a look? 117450 3 hayato 2015-01-23 05:15:58 +0000 One more clarification: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/commit/df811a8bdcdd1276ddb1b4ce2b513b78d6945f79 Please feel free to reopen this if we need further clarification.