27840 2015-01-15 12:43:04 +0000 Figure out which characters are valid in query/search 2015-06-18 10:04:04 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WHATWG URL unspecified PC Linux RESOLVED WORKSFORME P2 normal Unsorted 1 rubys annevk mike rubys sideshowbarker+urlspec oldest_to_newest 117209 0 rubys 2015-01-15 12:43:04 +0000 Characters which may need to revisited include '[' and ']'. http://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/?saved=3368 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1121826 117210 1 annevk 2015-01-15 12:53:41 +0000 The Mozilla bug is about the query component and as far as escaping goes the specification appears correct. Now conformance we may want to adjust, but that might also upset the RFC 3986 crowd... 117213 2 rubys 2015-01-15 13:22:00 +0000 > The Mozilla bug is about the query component and as far as escaping goes the specification appears correct. Now conformance we may want to adjust... OK, I've updated the bug summary to match. > but that might also upset the RFC 3986 crowd... At the moment, I'm resigned to the idea that the URL specification needs to have an appendix that describes the differences. 117279 3 rubys 2015-01-16 16:53:09 +0000 Related: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg13835.html 120989 4 annevk 2015-06-15 13:50:20 +0000 So what is wrong with matching RFC 3986 for validity? 121213 5 annevk 2015-06-18 10:04:04 +0000 Going to resolve this WORKSFORME since it's not actionable.