<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>2782</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2006-01-30 18:37:36 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Structures description of anySimpleType needs work</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2006-10-27 21:16:51 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>XML Schema</product>
          <component>Structures: XSD Part 1</component>
          <version>1.1 only</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard>thimble, easy</status_whiteboard>
          <keywords>resolved</keywords>
          <priority>P4</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="C. M. Sperberg-McQueen">cmsmcq</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="C. M. Sperberg-McQueen">cmsmcq</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="XML Schema comments list">www-xml-schema-comments</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>8048</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="C. M. Sperberg-McQueen">cmsmcq</who>
    <bug_when>2006-01-30 18:37:36 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The Schema Component Constraint: Simple Type Definition Properties
Correct in section 3.14.6 of Structures reads in part:

  All of the following must be true:

  2 All simple type definitions are derived ultimately from the
    ·simple ur-type definition (so· circular definitions are
    disallowed). That is, it is possible to reach a built-in primitive
    datatype or the ·simple ur-type definition· by repeatedly
    following the {base type type definition}.

Since &apos;derived&apos; is not defined in Datatypes so as to be a reflexive
relation, this wording is problematic.  Possible recastings include:

Take I

    2 All simple type definitions are, or are derived ultimately from,
    the ·simple ur-type definition (so· circular definitions are
    disallowed). That is, it is possible to reach a built-in primitive
    datatype or the ·simple ur-type definition· by following the {base
    type type definition} zero or more times.

Take II

  2 All simple type definitions are, or are derived ultimately from,
    the ·simple ur-type definition (so· circular definitions are
    disallowed). That is, from any ordinary simple type definition it
    is possible to reach a built-in primitive datatype or the ·simple
    ur-type definition· by following the {base type type definition}
    zero or more times.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>12631</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="C. M. Sperberg-McQueen">cmsmcq</who>
    <bug_when>2006-10-27 21:16:51 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>At its call of today, the WG agreed to adopt the Take I wording
given in comment #1 and close the issue.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>