<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>27808</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2015-01-12 14:42:42 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>[f+o 3.1] Missing references in parse-ietf-date (editorial)</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2015-02-10 17:08:46 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>XPath / XQuery / XSLT</product>
          <component>Functions and Operators 3.1</component>
          <version>Candidate Recommendation</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>minor</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Michael Kay">mike</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Michael Kay">mike</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="Mailing list for public feedback on specs from XSL and XML Query WGs">public-qt-comments</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>117021</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Kay">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2015-01-12 14:42:42 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The specification of parse-ietf-date refers (non-normatively) to various RFCs which should be listed in the non-normative references at the end of the document.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>117022</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Kay">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2015-01-12 15:08:48 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Also, this example is obviously wrong:

The expression fn:parse-ietf-date(&quot;Wed Jun 06 11:54:45 EST 2013&quot;) returns xs:dateTime(&quot;1994-06-06T11:54:45-0500&quot;).

The year doesn&apos;t match.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>117046</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Kay">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2015-01-12 22:44:20 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Also (not strictly editorial, but uncontroversial), the spec fails to say that when the argument is an empty sequence the result is an empty sequence.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>117288</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Kay">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2015-01-16 22:46:41 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The editorial problems with parse-ietf-date have now been fixed.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>