2758 2006-01-20 21:47:31 +0000 wd-33: Are lexical maps functions or relations? 2006-09-21 00:00:31 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XML Schema Datatypes: XSD Part 2 1.1 only PC Windows XP RESOLVED WONTFIX important, work, mappings cluster needsDrafting P2 normal --- 1 holstege cmsmcq www-xml-schema-comments oldest_to_newest 7922 0 holstege 2006-01-20 21:47:31 +0000 Request concerning Part 2 Transition history raised on 18 May 2005 by Henry S. Thompson (ht@inf.ed.ac.uk), on behalf of Schema WG (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-wg/2005May/att- 0024/Minutes_of_the_W3C_XML_Schema_Working_Group_5th__38th__F2F_meeting.htm) agreed on 19 May 2005 (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-wg/ 2005May/att-0024/ Minutes_of_the_W3C_XML_Schema_Working_Group_5th__38th__F2F_meeting.htm) Awaiting proposal from the editors. Acknowledgment cycle announced by group on 19 May 2005 (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml- schema-wg/2005May/att-0024/ Minutes_of_the_W3C_XML_Schema_Working_Group_5th__38th__F2F_meeting.htm) agreement by reviewer on 19 May 2005 (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c- xml-schema-wg/2005May/att-0024/ Minutes_of_the_W3C_XML_Schema_Working_Group_5th__38th__F2F_meeting.htm) Action history Part 2 Editors accepted on 19 May 2005 (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-wg/ 2005May/att-0024/ Minutes_of_the_W3C_XML_Schema_Working_Group_5th__38th__F2F_meeting.htm) DT editors to prepare an editorial proposal to resolve wd-33. 11924 1 cmsmcq 2006-09-21 00:00:31 +0000 At the face to face meeting of January 2006 in St. Petersburg, the Working Group decided not to take further action on this issue in XML Schema 1.1. (This issue was not discussed separately; it was one of those which were dispatched by a blanket decision that all other open issues would be closed without action, unless raised again in last-call comments.) Some members of the Working Group expressed regret over not being able to resolve all the issues dealt with in this way, but on the whole the Working Group felt it better not to delay Datatypes 1.1 in order to resolve all of them. This issue should have been marked as RESOLVED /WONTFIX at that time, but apparently was not. I am marking it that way now, to reduce confusion.