2755 2006-01-20 21:41:47 +0000 wd-29: URI changes in RFC 3986 2006-09-21 00:00:31 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XML Schema Datatypes: XSD Part 2 1.1 only PC Windows XP RESOLVED WONTFIX needsAgreement P2 normal --- 1 holstege cmsmcq www-xml-schema-comments oldest_to_newest 7919 0 holstege 2006-01-20 21:41:47 +0000 I would ask that the schema working group decide how or whether to upgrade the anyURI data type in schemas 1.1 to support the new syntax of RFC 3986. It's mostly but not quite the same as the older syntax in RFC 2396. For instance RFC 2396 allows an indefinite number of colons and @ signs in registry names, while 3986 does not. For instance, this URI is legal according to 2396 but not 3986: dcp.tcp.pft://192.168.0.1:1002:3002?fec=1&crc=0 This has recently been raised as an issue in Xerces-J's schema validation. See http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESJ-1060 There may be other incompatibilities as well. Proposal concerning Part 2 anyURI Transition history raised on 9 Apr 2005 by Elliotte Rusty Harold (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/ Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2005AprJun/0002.html) 11923 1 cmsmcq 2006-09-21 00:00:31 +0000 At the face to face meeting of January 2006 in St. Petersburg, the Working Group decided not to take further action on this issue in XML Schema 1.1. (This issue was not discussed separately; it was one of those which were dispatched by a blanket decision that all other open issues would be closed without action, unless raised again in last-call comments.) Some members of the Working Group expressed regret over not being able to resolve all the issues dealt with in this way, but on the whole the Working Group felt it better not to delay Datatypes 1.1 in order to resolve all of them. This issue should have been marked as RESOLVED /WONTFIX at that time, but apparently was not. I am marking it that way now, to reduce confusion.