2737 2006-01-20 20:59:37 +0000 wd-5: Editorial comments 2006-01-20 22:37:41 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XML Schema Datatypes: XSD Part 2 1.1 only PC Windows XP RESOLVED FIXED http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2004Jun/0295.html P2 normal --- 1 holstege cmsmcq www-xml-schema-comments oldest_to_newest 7901 0 holstege 2006-01-20 20:59:37 +0000 I don't see the value of pointing out that equality is a congruence relation. The only other occurrence of "congruence" is in the appendices that define it. I don't see what the first occurrence of "on the other hand" is referring to as the first hand. as in the Order section, we should define the '=' notation before using it instead of the other way around. I think you explained it, but I still find confusing, "there is one equality relation for all values of all datatypes" raised on 7 Apr 2004 by Xan Gregg (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml- schema-ig/2004Jun/0295.html) agreed on 19 Nov 2004 (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/ 2004Nov/0100.html) Assign to editors to fix Acknowledgment cycle Not started Action history Part 2 Editors accepted on 19 Nov 2004 (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/ 2004Nov/0100.html) Editors to attempt to resolve wd-5 in the next working draft 7934 1 holstege 2006-01-20 22:37:41 +0000 Part of omnibus proposal: http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-2/datatypes.omnibus.20050831.html Accepted with amendments finally at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2005/09/xml-schema-ftf-minutes.html#d0e2835