27247 2014-11-05 12:19:44 +0000 :active should match the labeled control of a label element that is currently matching :active (like :hover) 2015-01-07 08:05:13 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WHATWG HTML unspecified Other other RESOLVED FIXED https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#selector-active P3 normal Unsorted 1 contributor ian florian ian mike zcorpan contributor oldest_to_newest 114551 0 contributor 2014-11-05 12:19:44 +0000 Specification: https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/scripting.html Multipage: https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/#selector-active Complete: https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#selector-active Referrer: https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/ Comment: :active should match the labeled control of a label element that is currently matching :active (like :hover) http://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/saved/3288 Posted from: 90.230.218.37 by simonp@opera.com User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_9_5) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/38.0.2125.101 Safari/537.36 OPR/25.0.1614.35 (Edition beta) 114746 1 florian 2014-11-10 13:43:42 +0000 Browsers are already interoperable about this, as this works on Firefox, Chrome, Safari and IE (tested IE11). Presto does not, but it shouldn't matter. 116859 2 ian 2015-01-06 23:33:23 +0000 This seems like it would lead to really bad UI (e.g. making it look like buttons are being pressed even though they aren't), with no way to work around it (there's no :active-no-really-not-someone-else pseudo-class). But since it's interoperably implemented... :-( 116860 3 contributor 2015-01-06 23:34:08 +0000 Checked in as WHATWG revision r8873. Check-in comment: Match reality better for :active, even though this is suboptimal UI-wise. https://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=8872&to=8873 116877 4 zcorpan 2015-01-07 08:05:13 +0000 You wouldn't have a label for a button. For radio buttons and checkboxes it seems to me it is good UI.