26883 2014-09-22 10:09:33 +0000 Mark up the parts of the spec that are actually implemented 2014-09-24 19:53:54 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG Sourcing In-band Media Resource Tracks unspecified PC All NEW P2 normal --- 1 silviapfeiffer1 silviapfeiffer1 mike pcotton public-html-admin public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 111911 0 silviapfeiffer1 2014-09-22 10:09:33 +0000 Most of the spec is wishful thinking. It would be useful to provide markers for those parts of the spec that are actually implemented in browsers and in which browsers. 112077 1 pcotton 2014-09-24 14:20:43 +0000 (In reply to Silvia Pfeiffer from comment #0) > Most of the spec is wishful thinking. It would be useful to provide markers > for those parts of the spec that are actually implemented in browsers and in > which browsers. I have to wonder how we would select which browsers to provide information for? I know there several "major" browsers but what about regional local browsers in geographies like China and Russia? Would it better to figure out how to provide current separate testing results on a more regular basis and to determine how to link a spec to those testing results (possibly at the feature level)? /paulc 112109 2 silviapfeiffer1 2014-09-24 19:53:54 +0000 Note: this is not about the HTML spec, but about the Sourcing In-band media tracks spec. More to the point: major browsers (or maybe rather: rendering engines) would be a useful starting point. We can always take more information from anyone who has information about other browsers, too.