26497 2014-08-01 17:04:46 +0000 Return type "void" is misleading 2015-05-30 19:51:36 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Browser Test/Tools WG WebDriver unspecified PC All RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 20860 1 ato public-browser-tools-testing dburns mike public-browser-tools-testing oldest_to_newest 109760 0 ato 2014-08-01 17:04:46 +0000 Several command endpoints talk about "Return type: void". This is misleading because we don't send a response (not even an empty JSON dictionary) in such cases. 109761 1 ato 2014-08-01 17:07:21 +0000 Sorry that was misleading. Of course we send responses (https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webdriver/raw-file/tip/webdriver-spec.html#response-1) but it's unclear to me how we translate "void" into that. 109817 2 dburns 2014-08-04 08:51:32 +0000 just so I can understand the issue... We need to have a definition of when the WebIDL is void that we return success JSON blob? 109827 3 ato 2014-08-04 13:06:41 +0000 (In reply to David Burns :automatedtester from comment #2) > just so I can understand the issue... > > We need to have a definition of when the WebIDL is void that we return > success JSON blob? My impression was that we were not going to use WebIDL at all for defining the commands and responses. 120618 4 dburns 2015-05-30 19:51:36 +0000 We have removed IDL or in the process as we rewrite the spec so am closing.